This means that two building insurers have failed with their lawsuits in the last instance

//This means that two building insurers have failed with their lawsuits in the last instance

This means that two building insurers have failed with their lawsuits in the last instance

This means that two building insurers have failed with their lawsuits in the last instance

He left his political fate open in the event that he did not get a majority in Thursday’s election.

Previous polls put the Conservatives at well over 40 percent, Labor around 32 to 33 percent. New polls released over the weekend confirmed this trend, with minor losses for the Conservatives.

Beijing attacks Australia: when will China’s “naked aggression” hit Germany?

Opposition parties such as the Liberal Democrats and the Scottish National Party (SNP) called for tactical voting on Sunday: This would still make it possible to turn the wheel. The Labor Party around Jeremy Corbyn has little chance of a majority of its own and must hope to be able to form a minority government with the help of smaller parties after the election.

Great Britain has a majority vote: only the candidate who receives the most votes in one of the 650 constituencies gets a seat in the lower house. In many constituencies in central and northern England in particular, Johnson’s Tories and Labor are in a close race.

The focus of the election campaign is the controversial EU exit, for which the British voted with a narrow majority in the 2016 referendum, and the ailing state health service NHS.

Johnson’s answer to the question of the Sky News presenter about what was probably the naughtiest thing that he had ever done caused ridicule. The 55-year-old said he had ridden his bike on the sidewalk several times. Spicy: Johnson has been convicted of lying several times. For example, many years ago he was thrown out while working as a journalist for the renowned daily newspaper “The Times” because he deliberately falsified a quote there.

Johnson wants to implement Brexit by January 31. “Jeremy Corbyn, on the other hand, can’t even tell us what his stance is on Brexit,” said Johnson. He also renewed his promise to voters to use an Australian-style points system to reduce the number of immigrants. Leaked documents according to which goods from the British part of Northern Ireland must be checked for Great Britain after Brexit, he called false.

The 70-year-old Corbyn, who is regarded as a Eurosceptic, has promised the British a second Brexit referendum if he wins the election. But he wants to be neutral himself, as he recently announced. The old left is repeatedly criticized for anti-Semitism allegations against his party and himself.

In the last TV duel on Friday evening, Corbyn was able to increase the pressure on Johnson, but he did not make a breakthrough. According to a lightning poll by polling institute YouGov, viewers were split over who won the debate. 52 percent saw Johnson as the winner, for 48 percent Corbyn did better. The 1322 respondents rated the Labor leader (48 percent) as more trustworthy than Johnson (38 percent).

Scotland’s Prime Minister Nicola Sturgeon, whose Scottish National Party is likely to be the third largest party in parliament, saw both of them as losers in the TV duel: “That was utterly pathetic. Two men without inspiration, both unsuitable to be Prime Minister,” she wrote on Twitter . Before the debate, former Prime Ministers John Major (Conservatives) and Tony Blair (Labor) called for candidates to vote against Johnson’s Brexit deal.

Johnson did not take over as Prime Minister until the end of July from Theresa May, who had failed three times with her Brexit agreement in the completely divided parliament. With the new election, the head of government wants to get more support for his deal, which has been renegotiated with Brussels. He is currently leading a minority government.

Washington (AP) – An anonymous report on allegedly systematic resistance to President Donald Trump in its own ranks has caused an uproar in the US government. The search for the author of the explosive text is ongoing.123helpme.me

T-Online.de/TV

German nursing home becomes a hit online

Macron reports from quarantine with a video message

MPs reckon with sexism in the Bundestag

This building is way more famous than it looks

Instagram star dies after cosmetic surgery

Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes

US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona

NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars

These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden

Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine

Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament

Suddenly there is no stopping the minister

Container use due to Corona causes a stir

Towing service has a bad surprise

Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast

The guest post published by the New York Times on Wednesday (local time) said that high-ranking officials in the US government deliberately thwarted the implementation of Trump’s plans to prevent damage to the country.

The Washington Post reported that the uncertainty in the White House after the publication was enormous. There the text is examined for specific language patterns in order to track down the author. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence publicly denied that they had anything to do with the text.

Beijing attacks Australia: when will China’s “naked aggression” hit Germany?

The government official said that Trump’s actions were “detrimental to the welfare of our republic”. The President fails to understand “that many high-ranking employees in his own government are working incessantly from within to prevent parts of his program and his worst inclinations.”

Trump’s impulsive and absent-minded manner leads to half-baked, ill-informed and sometimes daring decisions. “Everyone who works with him knows that he does not follow any recognizable basic principles that guide his decision-making.” Many of those whom Trump has appointed “vowed that we are doing what we can to protect our democratic institutions,” writes the anonymous author. He continued: “We will do what we can to steer the government in the right direction until it is over – one way or another.”

It is unusual for the “New York Times” to publish a guest article without a name. It is at least as well that an employee of the US administration turns to a newspaper (which Trump also despises) to announce that there is active “resistance” against the president.

The “New York Times” claims to know the name of the author. The editors argue that anonymous publication is the only way to protect it and at the same time “convey an important point of view” to the readers.

The information service “Axios” reported that after the publication in the “New York Times” two other government employees contacted them and said that the author of the article spoke to them from their hearts. “Many of us would have wished we had written that,” “Axios” quoted one of them. “There are dozens and dozen of us.”

The contribution has caused the White House the greatest possible unrest. The Washington Post quoted a government official, referring to the author: “The problem for the president is that there could be so many people.” The newspaper reported that news circulated among employees in the government headquarters with the sentence: “The sleeper cells have awakened”.

Cabinet members saw themselves obliged to publicly deny authorship. When asked about the text, Foreign Minister Pompeo said on the sidelines of a visit to the Indian capital New Delhi: “This is not mine.” Vice President Mike Pence let it be known through his spokesman that he had nothing to do with the text. A number of other cabinet members also let their speakers explain that they were not the authors of the contribution. Trump’s entire team is now under pressure.

First Lady Melania Trump, who is otherwise reluctant to make public statements – especially offensive expressions of solidarity for her husband – spoke up. On CNN, she conveyed the following message to the author: “You are not protecting this country, you are sabotaging it with your cowardly actions.”

Vice President Mike Pence also let it be known through his spokesman that he had nothing to do with the text. The vice president gives his guest posts names, wrote Pences spokesman on Twitter.

Trump had already reacted angrily to the guest post on Wednesday (local time), speaking of a “cowardly” text and demanding that the “New York Times” must “immediately hand the anonymous author over to the government” for reasons of national security – if he actually did exist. On Twitter, Trump wrote in capital letters: “TREASURE?”

The “New York Times” describes the anonymous author as “Senior Official”, which can mean many government employees. So it is unclear how high-ranking the author actually is. What is clear, however, is that he paints a devastating picture of Trump’s White House – as did Pulitzer Prize winner Bob Woodward the day before.

On Tuesday, the first excerpts from Woodward’s new book on the Trump presidency were published, which will be published next Tuesday – and which Trump calls a “made up story”. The book also raises doubts as to whether the president is actually in control of the White House.

Berlin (AP) – On the 74th anniversary of the failed assassination attempt on Adolf Hitler on July 20, 1944, Foreign Minister Heiko Maas called for resistance against right-wing populist tendencies.

T-Online.de/TV

German nursing home becomes a hit online

Macron reports from quarantine with a video message

MPs reckon with sexism in the Bundestag

This building is way more famous than it looks

Instagram star dies after cosmetic surgery

Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes

US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona

NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars

These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden

Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine

Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament

Suddenly there is no stopping the minister

Container use due to Corona causes a stir

Towing service has a bad surprise

Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast

The SPD politician called it “shameful” on Friday when those of all people invoked the “right to resist”, who loudly reviled the representatives of the people as “traitors”, dismissed memory as a “cult of guilt” and vilified the free media as “lying press”. “And that is why there must not be a fine silence when angry citizens and those who have passed away from the past reinterpret such symbols of resistance perfidiously,” warned Maas.

“To remember also means to contradict loudly and clearly,” emphasized the minister. “This does not require martyrdom. In 2018, moral courage is sufficient,” said Maas.

Representatives from politics and society gathered in the courtyard of the Bendlerblock for a memorial event. In the late afternoon, Bundeswehr recruits were supposed to take their solemn pledge on the parade ground on the Bendlerblock, the seat of the Ministry of Defense.

On July 20, 1944, Wehrmacht officers around Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg tried in vain to kill Hitler with a bomb and to end the war. Stauffenberg and three co-conspirators were shot in the courtyard of the Bendler block on the evening of the attack. In the weeks and months that followed, the Nazis executed 89 other participants and supporters.

Karlsruhe (dpa) – A rubble recycler, on whose premises an old aircraft bomb was detonated in 2014, is not liable for the damage to the surrounding buildings.

T-Online.de/TV

German nursing home becomes a hit online

Macron reports from quarantine with a video message

MPs reckon with sexism in the Bundestag

This building is way more famous than it looks

Instagram star dies after cosmetic surgery

Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes

US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona

NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars

These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden

Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine

Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament

Suddenly there is no stopping the minister

Container use due to Corona causes a stir

Towing service has a bad surprise

Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast

A duty to examine all delivered rubble for hidden duds as a precaution would be excessive, decided the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in Karlsruhe on Friday.

The risk is no more to be attributed to the entrepreneur than to his neighbors. The explosion of a World War II bomb hits everyone “equally by chance and by fate”. (Az. V ZR 96/18 etc.)

New record: BKA forecast: Over 400 ATMs blown up this year Dozens of shocks on Saturday: Swarm quakes shake the earth in Vogtland Sauerland: Fatal accident in the sawmill: employee trapped Attack in Saarland: wild boar seriously injures man in his living room

This means that two building insurers have failed with their lawsuits in the last instance. After settling the claim, they wanted a total of more than one million euros back from the recycling company.

The almost three-meter-long high-explosive bomb was detonated in Euskirchen in the Rhineland while crushing building rubble. A worker died – he had tried to cut the lump with the bomb in it with his excavator. 13 people were injured. The pressure wave was so powerful that windows shattered 400 meters away.

It seems very, very rare that a bomb from the Second World War ends up in the rubble at a recycling yard. In the previous trial at the Bonn Regional Court and the Cologne Higher Regional Court, the judges only came across one comparable case.

The precautionary screening of all rubble would therefore be disproportionate in the opinion of the BGH Senate. “Of course a visual inspection is necessary,” said the presiding judge Christina Stresemann. In that case, however, the bomb hadn’t protruded anywhere.

By | 2021-01-10T07:17:06-06:00 May 29th, 2020|Uncategorized|0 Comments

About the Author: